This book has often been censored and protested because of its content. Some people believe that it is disgusting. It appears on the American Library Association's List of Most Commonly Challenged Books in the U.S. of 1990-2000. It is number 96 on the list. "Most Commonly Challenged" means that many people have argued that it shouldn't be read, shouldn't be in our schools, or in our libraries. What do you think, does How to Eat Fried Worms deserve to be on this list? Give details to support your answer.
More "food" for thought: Shel Silverstein's collection of poems "A Light in the Attic" is also on the list.
5 comments:
I think schools should read this book because it is a fun book to read.There is nothing rong with this book.That is why
i think this book should be read.And is not like it shows you hes eating it.It shows him at the end.
Yes I think that we should not read the book because It's nasty and It's inpropereaite for schools becauseIt says bad words.
I thinck it shudent be red beacus it is not ipopriet and it is nasty and pepole will do the same thing.
yes, because this book has lot of bad words in it and some fight in it so that why it shoud be challenged. and we shouid still have the movie of how to eat fried worms.
1. no beacuse it's deskusting and intopropiet for school.
2.it should not be in schools becuse it have bad words and it's not school lanwaige
Post a Comment